Bioresonance therapy is an alternative treatment method that uses electromagnetic frequencies to address imbalances in the body. When applied to animals, it can help to alleviate a range of health conditions by promoting natural healing processes. This non-invasive therapy is gaining popularity among pet owners who are looking for safe and effective ways to support their animal’s well-being. Learn more about bioresonance therapy for animals and how it may benefit your furry friend.
Bioresonance has long been used to identify and target the root cause of a variety of health problems in people. More recently, this technology has also been applied to pets and other animals with much success. BICOM® bioresonance therapy can be used in the treatment of various types of animals, including, Dogs, Cats, Horses, Rodents, Birds and more.
You can also learn more about the features of the specific devices in the BICOM® range through our therapy machine page. This can help you to see which product will suit you, your clients and your practice best.
Bioresonance cancer treatment is a controversial alternative therapy that claims to diagnose and treat cancer using electromagnetic waves. Practitioners believe that every cell in the human body emits electromagnetic frequencies and that diseases, including cancer, disrupt these frequencies. They argue that bioresonance therapy can detect these disturbances and restore the body's natural balance by modifying electromagnetic signals.
Originally developed in Germany in 1977 by Franz Morell and his son-in-law, Erich Rasche, bioresonance therapy was first introduced as MORA therapy—a name derived from their surnames. Over the years, it has been marketed as a non-invasive, pain-free treatment for various ailments, including cancer. Despite its growing popularity in alternative medicine circles, alternative cancer therapy lacks strong scientific backing.
According to proponents, bioresonance therapy uses a specialized device that reads the body's electromagnetic signals through electrodes placed on the skin. The device then allegedly detects "harmful frequencies" associated with diseases like cancer and emits counteracting frequencies to neutralize them. The goal is to restore the body's natural balance, supposedly allowing the immune system to fight cancer more effectively.
Advocates of bioresonance cancer treatment claim that it:
Identifies cancer-related disturbances in the body's energy field.
Supports the body's natural ability to heal by eliminating harmful frequencies.
Strengthens the immune system to help combat cancer.
Works as a non-invasive alternative to conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiation.
These claims, however, are not supported by scientific evidence, raising concerns about the validity and safety of this treatment approach.
Bioresonance therapy has been widely criticized by the scientific and medical communities due to a lack of verifiable evidence supporting its effectiveness. Several studies have examined its claims, and the results have been overwhelmingly negative.
The fundamental premise of bioresonance therapy—altering electromagnetic frequencies to treat diseases—is not supported by modern medical science. The human body does emit electrical signals, but these are primarily related to nerve activity and do not function as an "energy field" that can be manipulated to cure diseases.
Although bioresonance therapy is promoted as a cancer treatment, there is no reliable scientific research proving its effectiveness. Medical experts emphasize that bioresonance therapy has not undergone the rigorous clinical trials required to establish it as a legitimate cancer treatment.
One study on bioresonance therapy in children with atopic dermatitis found no significant improvement compared to placebo treatments. If the therapy cannot reliably treat minor skin conditions, there is little reason to believe it can cure something as complex as cancer.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken action against bioresonance devices, classifying them as unapproved medical devices. In some cases, manufacturers have been prosecuted for making false claims about their ability to diagnose and treat diseases, including cancer.
Some patients report feeling better after bioresonance therapy, but this is likely due to the placebo effect—where patients experience perceived improvements simply because they believe in the treatment. The problem arises when patients choose bioresonance therapy over proven cancer treatments, delaying necessary medical care and potentially worsening their condition.
Choosing alternative cancer therapy over scientifically proven therapies can have serious consequences. Here’s why:
Cancer is a progressive disease that requires prompt and effective treatment. Relying on unproven methods like bioresonance can result in crucial delays, allowing the disease to advance to more severe stages.
Many clinics and practitioners charge high fees for bioresonance therapy, despite the lack of scientific validation. Patients desperate for a cure may spend large sums of money on a treatment that has no proven benefits.
Some bioresonance advocates claim that their therapy can replace chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. This misinformation can lead patients to abandon life-saving treatments in favor of an unproven approach.
There have been cases where practitioners falsely claimed that bioresonance therapy could cure cancer, leading to legal action. Authorities have prosecuted individuals for misleading patients and promoting unproven treatments.
Medical experts, cancer researchers, and regulatory agencies strongly discourage the use of bioresonance cancer treatment.
The American Cancer Society: States that there is no scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of bioresonance therapy for diagnosing or treating cancer.
WebMD: Warns that bioresonance therapy is not backed by scientific research and should not be used as a replacement for conventional cancer treatment.
Quackwatch: Describes bioresonance therapy as a pseudoscience with no legitimate medical basis.
Additionally, multiple regulatory agencies, including the FDA and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), have taken action against bioresonance devices, banning their sale or prosecuting individuals making false claims.
While alternative cancer therapy lacks scientific credibility, some complementary approaches have shown promise when used alongside conventional treatments. These include:
A balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can support the immune system and overall health during cancer treatment.
Practices like meditation, yoga, and acupuncture have been found to help reduce stress and improve the quality of life for cancer patients.
Regular exercise has been linked to improved outcomes for cancer patients, helping to boost energy levels and reduce treatment side effects.
Certain herbal supplements, such as turmeric (curcumin) and green tea extract, have been studied for their potential anti-cancer properties. However, these should always be used under the guidance of a healthcare professional.
Health authorities worldwide have warned against the use of bioresonance devices for diagnosing or treating cancer. The FDA has classified these machines as unapproved medical devices, and several manufacturers have faced legal actions for making false claims. In the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has also issued warnings regarding misleading advertisements. Patients are urged to rely on evidence-based treatments instead of unverified alternative methods.
Many cancer patients seek alternative treatments due to fear of side effects from conventional therapies. While some complementary therapies can support well-being, unproven methods like bioresonance therapy can delay necessary medical interventions. Choosing an unverified treatment over scientifically backed options can lead to worsening conditions and reduced survival rates. Always consult a qualified oncologist before considering any alternative therapy.
Bioresonance cancer treatment lacks scientific support and is classified as pseudoscience. The claims surrounding its effectiveness are not backed by clinical evidence, and relying on it as a cancer treatment can be dangerous. Regulatory agencies have taken action against misleading claims, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based medicine.
Patients diagnosed with cancer should seek treatment from qualified oncologists who use scientifically validated approaches. Cancer is a serious condition that requires proven medical treatments, and falling for unverified methods like bioresonance therapy can have life-threatening consequences.
Bioresonance therapy is an alternative treatment that claims to detect and modify electromagnetic frequencies in the body to promote healing.
There is no scientific evidence proving that bioresonance can cure or treat cancer effectively.
While non-invasive, bioresonance therapy may be unsafe if used as a substitute for proven medical treatments.
No, major health organizations, including the FDA, do not recognize bioresonance as a valid medical treatment.
Bioresonance therapy is generally considered risk-free but lacks evidence of any medical benefits.
These devices claim to detect and alter the body's electromagnetic signals, though no scientific proof supports this.
Many users report feeling better due to the placebo effect, but this does not mean the therapy works.
Doctors recommend sticking to evidence-based treatments instead of unproven alternatives like bioresonance.
No reputable clinical trials confirm bioresonance as an effective cancer treatment.
Nutrition, exercise, and mind-body therapies like meditation have shown benefits when used alongside medical treatment.
Quick Links
Facebook
Instagram
Mail